2015 Federal Issues in Review
January 5th, 2016 | By: Whitford Remer
As civil engineers, ASCE works with federal lawmakers to pass legislation that will improve the nation’s “D+” infrastructure. In 2015, the federal government passed several notable pieces of legislation that will increase investment into our nation’s infrastructure and also prepare the next generation of civil engineers through STEM education. Here’s a review of the accomplishments.
U.S. Senator Thomas Carper (DE) speaking on the Senate floor on the need to #FixTheTrustFund.
- Maintaining standards and tests in math and science
- Expanding high-quality STEM courses
- Encouraging development of statewide assessments that integrate engineering and technology concepts
- Providing direct grants for students’ STEM educational enrichment activities
- Maintaining funding for teacher training
Congress’ Infrastructure To Do List for Fall
September 3rd, 2015 | By: Infrastructure Report Card
Summer comes to an end next week as Congress returns to the Capitol after a five-week recess. Deadlines will be the theme this fall, with the first being the Oct. 1 funding deadline to keep the government open. The second important deadline for ASCE is Oct. 29, when MAP-21, the surface transportation bill, expires. With a D+ cumulative GPA, the topic of America’s infrastructure should be at the top of their to-do lists. Congress has several opportunities to address some of the nation’s infrastructure needs in the coming weeks. Here’s what to watch: 1. Transportation Before the U.S. Senate adjourned for August recess, they passed the DRIVE Act, a six-year surface transportation bill. The DRIVE Act would end the current cycle of short-term program extensions and increase federal funding for surface transportation programs. The U.S. House of Representatives has until a new deadline of October 29 to act to pass their own multi-year bill before the current law expires. ASCE has been focused on communicating with House members on the need to act quickly and pass a long-term bill. You can help by contacting your House members and urging them to #FixTheTrustFund. 2. Appropriations for Federal Infrastructure Programs So far this year, the House has only passed six of 12 annual appropriations bills and the Senate has not yet passed a single one. There is an Oct. 1 deadline to complete this year’s appropriation. Among the major dilemmas holding up the appropriations process are disagreements over the overall funding amounts for the federal government, policy riders that bog down spending bills and fundamental differences on what level to fund federal environmental, healthcare and military programs. While it’s difficult enough for Congress to fund popular established bipartisan programs like the Drinking Water and Clean Water State Revolving funds (which are facing 23% cuts), newer programs, like the Levee Safety Initiative, have not received any funding since the Water Resources Reform & Development Act (WRRDA) passed. If these programs do not receive appropriations, then the progress made by creating them becomes stagnant and no real progress is made in addressing the infrastructure the legislation aimed to improve. With only 12 days to debate the remaining appropriations bills and take full chamber votes, Congress will resort to passing a short-term extension of federal government programs at the same funding levels as last fiscal year. These patches – also known as continuing resolutions – have become the common fallback solution where such large disagreements – even among members in the same party – impede the “regular order” appropriations process from working. 3. STEM and Science To ensure we have enough engineers to be stewards of our nation’s infrastructure in the future, we need to educate today’s students in STEM. Congress will return with competing legislation to reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA); the last version was known as the No Child Left Behind Act, which would make changes to STEM education policies. The House version, known as the Student Success Act (H.R. 5), has been a purely partisan affair from the beginning, and passed the House with no Democratic Support. The Senate version, known as the Every Child Achieves Act of 2015 (S. 1177), is a bipartisan compromise measure which passed that chamber with wide support. The House bill makes significant cuts to educational programs and places no emphasis on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) programs. The Senate bill includes a focus on improving learning in the critical STEM subjects. ASCE, as a founding member of the STEM Education Coalition, strongly favors the Senate bill. It remains to be seen if House Republicans will be willing to compromise enough to move the legislation. Also facing the House/Senate divide is legislation to reauthorize the America COMPETES Act, which authorizes most of the nation’s non-medical, civilian research and development programs. The House passed H.R. 1806, the America COMPETES Act Reauthorization, earlier this year along the same partisan divide on their education bill. The House bill has been strongly condemned ASCE and other engineering, scientific, academic, and industry groups for making cuts to several areas including geosciences, as well as altering the National Science Foundation’s time-tested peer review method of awarding grants. The Senate Commerce Committee is meanwhile struggling to reach a bi-partisan compromise. Both pieces of legislation are long overdue and needed going forward, however if past performance is any indication then success is unlikely. This summer the Senate demonstrated that they can make infrastructure legislation a priority by passing the DRIVE Act. Now it’s time for that momentum to carry into the fall. Tell your members of Congress to make infrastructure a priority through the Save America’s Infrastructure phone app for iPhone and Android or online.Education Bill on the Move
April 21st, 2015 | By: Becky Moylan
Exposing students to a science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) curriculum is an essential part of making sure we are prepared for our future infrastructure needs, as it ensures that the next generation has civil engineers who can continue to be stewards of our nation’s infrastructure. Currently, the U.S. Congress is considering an education bill that would play a role in defining the STEM curriculum. The Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee last week approved, by an unexpected unanimous vote, the Every Child Achieves Act. The bill was a compromise worked out between Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander (R-TN) and Ranking Democrat Patty Murray (D-WA) and would reauthorize and amend the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), replacing the previous version best known as “No Child Left Behind.” NCLB has proven to be controversial and since 2006 efforts by Congress to move to the next reauthorization have failed. The approval last week by the HELP Committee is the first positive move in some time. As approved the bill would continue to require the current level of testing in reading, math, and science, but it would allow states to set up their own accountability systems. Essentially the law continues to measure the academic progress of students, but restore to states the responsibility for deciding what to do about improving student achievement. The compromise nature of the measure means that few policy stakeholder groups are fully satisfied with the bill in its current form. Consideration by the full Senate, which hasn’t yet been scheduled, is likely to spark some partisan fireworks over issues ranging from school vouchers to the level of the power the U.S. Department of Education should have when it comes to ensuring schools are improved for disadvantaged students. To foster an appreciation and understanding of Stem at the K-12 level, one of ASCE’s 2015 Federal Priority Issues, based on a survey of members and adopted by the Board of Direction, is STEM education. Toward that end, ASCE is a member of the STEM Education Coalition, a Coalition which is comprised of more than 500 business, professional and education organizations, with the goal of improving U.S. achievement in STEM subjects. Since ESEA is the single largest federal legislation dealing with K-12 education, it is the Coalition goal to make sure that any reauthorization makes STEM education a priority. ASCE and its allies in the STEM Coalition score a victory during the bill’s consideration when a Coalition-endorsed amendment sponsored by Senators Al Franken (D-MN), Mark Kirk (R-IL) was adopted by a 12-10 vote. The amendment provides each state with formula-based funding to support partnerships between local schools, businesses, universities, and non-profit organizations to improve student learning in STEM subjects. Each state would choose how to spend and prioritize these funds, which can support a wide range of STEM activities from in-depth teacher training, to engineering design competitions, to improving the diversity of the STEM workforce. As mentioned above, the legislation faces hurdles ahead. Providing the measure can gain full Senate approval, there is still the matter of the House of Representatives. The House Education and Workforce Committee approved their version of ESEA reauthorization, H.R. 5, the Student Success Act on a strictly partisan vote. However, on the House floor, the bill stalled after conservative groups objected that the bill did not go far enough to cut programs and pull back federal involvement in education. Provided the full Senate can approve its version of the reauthorization, it is clear that the only way forward is for the House Republican leadership to accept Democratic support in order to move the bill to the White House.Tags: stem
No Comments »
D.C.’s Dunbar High School Goes Deep to Go Green
October 10th, 2013 | By: America's Infrastructure Report Card


Tags: stem, sustainability
No Comments »
Draft Bill Would Change Long Established Peer Review For NSF Research
May 13th, 2013 | By: America's Infrastructure Report Card
Draft legislation is being circulated by new House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-TX) which would require all research funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to be certified to “advance the national health, prosperity, or welfare” and “secure the national defense” of the United States. The NSF must certify that each funded project is of “the finest quality, is groundbreaking, and answers questions or solves problems that are of utmost importance to society of large.” The draft legislation has drawn a vigorous response from the scientific committee. A letter to Smith from six former NSF Directors stated, “ We believe that this draft legislation would replace the current merit-based system used to evaluate research and education proposals with a cumbersome and unrealistic certification process that rather than improving the quality of research would do just the opposite. The history of science and technology has shown that truly basic research often yields breakthroughs – including new technologies, markets and jobs – but that it is impossible to predict which projects (and which fields) will do that. Progress in science requires freedom to explore important questions regardless of where the answers may lead. Over the years, federal funding of basic research, using peer review evaluation, has led to vast improvements in health care, national security, and economic development.” The draft also drew a sharp response from Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-TX) the top Democrat on the Committee. In a letter to Smith, Johnson called the draft legislation “the first step on a path that would destroy the merit-based review process at NSF and intrudes political pressure into what is widely viewed as the most effective and creative process for awarding research funds in the world. It is this process that has supported the growth of the American research university system, and it is this process that has established the American research enterprise as innovation of our age.” ASCE has joined with other scientific and engineering organizations in a letter to Smith urging him to withdraw the proposed legislation. A copy of the current draft of the legislation is here.Tags: congress, national science foundation, stem
No Comments »
Obama’s FY 2014 Priorities STEM Education Programs
April 19th, 2013 | By: America's Infrastructure Report Card
The President’s FY 2014 budget request places new emphasis on STEM (Science-Technology- Education-Mathematics) education. The total STEM education funding request, across all federals agencies, amounts to $3.1 billion; this represents an increase of 6.7 percent over 2012 funding levels. While the proposed increase is noteworthy, the President’s proposal includes an ambitious reorganization of federal STEM programs. The major components include consolidation or elimination of 114 federal STEM programs. This would bring the total down from 226 to 112. Specifically 78 programs are terminated with funds redirected to other agencies (this totals $176 million). The breakdown by Agency of targeted programs and the expected savings:- Department of Defense: 6 programs (out of 16) – $49.4 million
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA): 38 programs (out of 61) – $47.5 million
- National Institutes of Health (NIH): 9 programs (out of 24) – $27.6 million
- Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): 2 programs (out of 7) – $16.1 million
- National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA): 6 programs (out of 15) – $13.0 million
- Department of Agriculture (USDA): 6 programs (out of 16) – $10.9 million
- Department of Energy: 8 programs (out of 18) – $10.9 million
- Department of Homeland Security: 1 program (out of 3) – $1.0 million
- Nuclear Regulatory Commission: 1 program (out of 3) – less than $0 million
Tags: congress, stem
No Comments »