Now Available for Your iPad

*/ ?>
2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure Get the full experience

Now Available for Your iPad

*/ ?>
Save America's Instrastructure Pocket Guide - Get the best experience
2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure Get the full experience

Now Available for Your Android

2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure Get the full experience

Now Available for Your Android Tablet

America's GPA: D+
Estimated Investment Needed by 2020:
$3.6 Trillion

Hidden, But Not Forgotten: The Engineering Role in Legacy Site Remediation

November 5th, 2015 | By: Whitford Remer

Gold King Mine Spill Emergency Retaining Ponds. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

Gold King Mine Spill Emergency Retaining Ponds. Image from Wikimedia Commons.

Ever since the Gold King mine accident this August in Colorado, public interest has grown – with Congress following suit – in the murky environmental legacy issue of abandoned mines that are pervasive across the American landscape.  Often unbeknownst even to nearby neighbors, abandoned mines represent a pastime of American history that drove Western development and fueled – often literally – the rapid growth of our country’s infrastructure. Mines come in many sorts: open pit, placer and hardrock. Hydraulic fracturing or fracking is another, more complex hydrocarbon extraction method. The minerals extracted from these mines help pave our roads, produce power and are critical to many of our modern day electronics. When the cost of extracting minerals exceeds the value a mining company receives, the mines are shut down. Unfortunately, in the early days of mining before federal law required companies to remediate sites shafts were simply boarded up at the end of the mines useful life. In many cases, for the next decade or two water would fill the abandoned mining shaft and mix with leftover mineral content to create a toxic sludge. On August 5, 2015 in Silverton, Colorado a dam holding back a mustard-colored tidal wave of sulfuric acid laden water was breached by a contractor of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) working in the area to set up monitoring equipment.  (See live footage of the breach occurring here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBlR05tDCbI). The resulting deluge closed down the Animas River. Congress has responded to the Gold King mine incident by introducing legislation that would provide additional resources and avenues for local communities to utilize if an abandoned mine thereat exists. A hearing on Capitol Hill Wednesday focused of two efforts under consideration: H.R. 3844 would create a new entity that could independently help with abandoned mine remediation, and importantly, accept private foundation money. The second bill, H.R. 3843 would extend Good Samaritan liability to the private sector to assist in abandon mine clean ups – an idea that’s been met with resistance because some argue mining companies could take advantage of the protection. Abandoned mines, orphaned wells and toxic sites are all legacy environmental issues that can be addressed by good engineering practices. However, remediation plans must have buy-in across all levels of government and the community to be successful. In the case of Gold King, for years the local community rejected being listed on the National Priorities List (NPL) for potential Superfund aid, fearing negative publicity. The decision to reject NPL status was in part fueled because Superfund is subject to annual appropriations and the guaranteed revenue stream (a tax on oil and chemical production) expired in the 1990’s, meaning it can take decades for Superfund project to commence. Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ) is trying to restate that tax. (See related recent GAO article on Superfund).

No Comments »

California DOT Issues Proposal Rule for Fracking

November 22nd, 2013 | By: America's Infrastructure Report Card

With vast reserves of hydrocarbon energy trapped deep under its surface, the state of California is getting ready to oversee the exploration for and recovery of the nation’s largest supply of oil and natural gas from shale fields.  The California Department of Conservation (DOC) has issued a proposed rule that would govern the petroleum industry’s use of hydraulic fracturing and other methods of recovering oil and natural gas from shale thousands of feet below the Earth’s surface. Technically recoverable shale oil resources in the continental 48 states amount to 23.9 billion barrels.  The largest shale oil formation in the U.S., however, is the Monterey—Santos play in southern California, which is estimated to hold 15.4 billion barrels or 64 percent of the nation’s total shale oil resources, a potentially enormous energy supply. But because most shale gas and shale oil wells are only a few years old, their long-term productivity is untested, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).  Consequently, the long-term production profiles of shale wells and their estimated ultimate recovery of oil and natural gas are uncertain. Nevertheless, the California DOC is getting ready for the increased use of deep oil and gas recovery through a comprehensive set of regulations required by the state legislature in September.  The DOC’s proposal was released on the same day the law was signed.  The DOC has established a web site for the rule.    The rule would govern all forms of well stimulation treatment, including hydraulic fracturing.  Another key exploration technology, “acid well stimulation treatment,” also would be regulated.  Acid stimulation, called acidizing, typically involves the injection of high volumes of hydrofluoric acid, a powerful solvent, into the oil well to dissolve rock deep underground and allow oil to flow up through the well.   Conventional hydraulic fracturing, in which water and other chemicals are pumped at high pressure to create fissures in the rocks, reportedly does not work well in many parts of the Monterey Shale—a rock formation known for its complexity and low permeability, which makes hydraulic fracturing less effective. As proposed, the DOC rule would require a permit for well operations; reports of third-party water tests to be provided to all property owners and tenants near the well; pressure testing of all well tubing for at least 30 minutes before well stimulation; monitoring of all wells during and after operations; storage and handling requirements for all treatment fluids; and public disclosure of “the trade name, supplier, concentration, and a brief description of each additive contained in the wells stimulation fluids.”  The rule also would require public disclosure of all sources, volumes, and specific composition of all water used in well stimulation and the disclosure of all disposal of well treatment fluids. These requirements track with ASCE Policy Statement 539, Hydraulic Fracturing.  The ASCE Government Relations Department will analyze the proposed rule in detail and provide the Society’s official comments to the DOC by the January 14, 2014, deadline.  ASCE members in California with professional expertise in oil and gas exploration and water-quality issues are urged to visit the DOC web site to determine whether they should comment on the rule as practicing civil engineers.

Tags: , , , , , ,
No Comments »

Help Save America's Infrastructure!
Hide Buttons