Now Available for Your iPad

*/ ?>
2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure Get the full experience

Now Available for Your iPad

*/ ?>
Save America's Instrastructure Pocket Guide - Get the best experience
2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure Get the full experience

Now Available for Your Android

2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure Get the full experience

Now Available for Your Android Tablet

America's GPA: D+
Estimated Investment Needed by 2020:
$3.6 Trillion

Advocate Profile: Amanda Hanaway-Corrente, PE, MBA

October 30th, 2014 | By: Olivia Wolfertz

Amanda being honored as Vermont’s 2011 Young Engineer of the Year.  Her extensive work with ASCE set her apart from the competition.

Amanda being honored as Vermont’s 2011 Young Engineer of the Year. Her extensive work with ASCE set her apart from the competition.

Amanda Hanaway-Corrente, PE, MBA, is a member of the Vermont section. She works at the University of Vermont (UVM) Transportation Research Center (TRC) as the New England Transportation Consortium (NETC) Coordinator. She also represents the UVM TRC as the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTRANS) Research Advisory Committee (RAC) Liaison, ensuring strong communication between UVM and VAOT on various research initiatives. Amanda chaired the committee that produced the 2014 Report Card for Vermont’s Infrastructure, which was released October 16. She also chairs the Vermont Raise the Bar Committee. Amanda has a Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering from UVM, a Master’s in Business Administration from the University of Rhode Island, and a Professional Engineering License in the State of Vermont. Her professional engineering license is in the field of transportation engineering as she has designed many roads, roundabouts, and parking lots prior to becoming involved in transportation research. If you are interested in becoming involved with ASCE’s Key Contact Program and promoting the profession through advocacy, learn more information and sign up at asce.org. How did you become interested in and get involved in advocacy for your profession?  My first employer out of college was Stantec.  I worked out of their South Burlington office and was strongly encouraged to get involved with engineering societies in Vermont.  I started with ASCE, but have also held positions on the Board of Directors for the Vermont Society of Professional Engineers.  I have attended several meetings for the Society of Women Engineers, Vermont Society of Engineers, and American Council of Engineering Companies as well. What issues have you highlighted/focused on when communicating with your legislators? Lately, my two major focal points have been the 2014 update to the Report Card for Vermont’s Infrastructure and the Raise the Bar initiative, since I am the chair of both committees in Vermont.  Earlier this year I attended the annual ASCE Fly-In event on Capitol Hill, which had us focusing on the surface transportation reauthorization and the Water Resources Reform and Development Act. What levels of government have you focused your efforts on? I am currently trying to expand my network at the local, state, and federal levels.  Opportunities that I use to accomplish this goal include:
  • Attending various conferences on behalf of the UVM, TRC and ASCE, taking each as an opportunity to meet people who affect change on a national level.  For example, I attended the Annual ASCE Fly-In Event earlier this year.
  • Acting as a research liaison for my office with the Vermont Agency of Transportation, which provides the opportunity to make connections on the state level.
  • Staying involved with several engineering societies in Vermont in an effort to stay on top of local and state issues.
  • Attending events such as “The Day Under the Dome “at the Vermont Statehouse, which provides an opportunity to network with our legislators.
Most of my government relations activities are focused on State and Federal employees and appointees that do work in the field of transportation.  The Vermont Section of ASCE just added the Government Relations Representative position to their Board of Directors last year.  At this point, I am trying to learn who the various players are before crafting a specific plan or focus with respect to outreach and advocacy.  One thing I have done to learn more is to reach out to several people with experience in advocacy to serve on committees with me.  These folks have been instrumental in helping develop advocacy plans and mentoring me as a Government Relations Representative. I was recently interviewed by Vermont Public Radio for the release of the 2014 Report Card for Vermont’s Infrastructure on October 16th. How do you gather information and prepare to do your advocacy work?  The ASCE website is an excellent tool.  I can always find PowerPoint presentations, guidelines, and other documents that help me get up to speed with the issues and how to advocate on their behalf. ASCE National has support staff for both the Raise the Bar Initiative and the State Infrastructure Report Cards.  This staff is always very responsive to requests, and they have a lot of tools that might not even be on the website. I also use the Vermont Section Board of Directors and Regional Governors as a resource for a lot of issues. What have you learned through your activities as an ASCE advocate and citizen lobbyist? Prior to volunteering as the Vermont Section Government Relations Representative, I had limited knowledge about how the Legislature and Congress worked on a local, state or national level.  I worked almost entirely in my silo of transportation engineering, design, and research.  I am now much more familiar with the schedule, players, and processes associated with the Legislature and Congress.   I am currently working with a committee to pass new legislation in the State of Vermont with respect to the Raise the Bar Initiative, and that committee includes a member of the Vermont House of Representatives.  I have learned that having a member of the Legislature on your team is tremendously helpful for being an ASCE advocate and citizen lobbyist; their insight is invaluable. Has the experience helped you improve skills you utilize personally or professionally? Absolutely!  Chairing two committees at once really sharpens my communication skills and efficiency.  We try to accomplish the most amount of work with the least amount of effort, especially since we are all volunteering our time.  The volunteers come from all over Vermont, so communication has to be done in a way that keeps everyone in the loop at all times and does not exclude anyone. With every ASCE Event I attend I expand my network to include more professionals in my industry.  Since my job is focused on linking needs with available resources, having a diverse network is essential. What has been challenging about being an advocate? And how did you overcome them? My biggest challenge is trying not to push people too much.  You have to remember that your fellow Section Board of Directors and committee members are all volunteering their time too.  Sometimes personal matters come up and a Board Member has to back down from a committee, so the rest of the committee binds together to absorb the work.  It is important to balance workloads among the committee members and push the goals of the committee forward, without burning people out.  I try to be reasonable about expectations and not over commit the committee to unfeasible tasks and deadlines.  At times where setting high effort, quick turnaround goals are necessary, it is important that the entire committee agree to the necessity before setting tasks and deadlines. What have you found rewarding about your efforts? Is there a particularly memorable experience you can share? The most rewarding aspect of being involved with ASCE is a sense of confidence in my abilities.  I was very young when I was President of the Vermont Section, which provided me experience on how to manage a team before I was ever offered a role in management at my job.   When I was finally offered a job in management, I had developed the experience to accept and fulfill my new management role confidently. The most rewarding moment of my career was being named Vermont’s 2011 Young Engineer of the Year.  I am fairly certain that my work with ASCE set me apart from the other nominees.  The very next year, the Vermont Section won the Outstanding Section & Branch 2012 Award for small sections.  I remember the exact moment I found out that we had won:  For the last few years, the Vermont Section has been hosting a Toys for Tots drive as our December Event.  I was standing by the bar during the social hour of the event when one of our ASCE Regional Governors came up and told me the news.  I immediately raised my fist in the air and jumped with delight, bumping into the man standing behind me and spilling most of his drink.  I was so excited because I had worked really hard on filling out the application, a responsibility the Board of Directors had entrusted me with. Our section deserved the award and I found it so rewarding to be able to facilitate the effort to obtain it.  In 2013, we won the Outstanding Section & Branch Award again, using the 2012 application as a template. Since then, my most recent memorable moment is being selected as a member to profile in ASCE’s new Advocacy Profile Spotlight!  Moments like those remind me why I work so hard. Have you felt that your efforts have made a difference?  How? I am sure that my efforts have made a difference in various ways, but the one example that stands out to me is being able to mentor young engineers.  I am constantly offering help to college students and young engineers move forward in the professional world.  There are so many career options for civil engineers and it can be scary when you are first starting out. The myriad of connections I have made in the engineering world through ASCE make me a valuable resource to these young engineers.  I help them with resumes, mock interviews, which engineering companies exist, what the companies do, what would be the best fit based on the individual student, what certifications they should be working towards, etc.  I have even helped students make regional and national connections. What advice would you give to someone interested in getting involved in advocacy?  First, I would tell them that getting involved with ASCE was the most valuable thing I have done for my career.  Then I would ask some pointed questions to help them determine what type of advocacy work would be best suited for them.  I would also recommend them to get support from their employer. The value of being involved with ASCE is completely transferable to the work environment. If you can align your contributions to ASCE with work for your employer, the work’s value is increased significantly.

Tags: , , , , ,
No Comments »

Vote “Yes” to Invest in a Louisiana Infrastructure Bank

October 23rd, 2014 | By: Maria Matthews

Amend the Louisiana State Constitution on November 4 to allow the legislature to designate public funds for eligible transportation projects. This is a critical step towards establishing the Louisiana Infrastructure Bank as it creates a mechanism to allocate funds that will provide the state with safer roads and stimulate local economies. A “yes” vote on Amendment 4 will authorize the allocation of state funds to an infrastructure bank for eligible transportation projects and prompt the state legislature to take necessary steps toward the Bank’s creation. Louisiana has a severely underfunded infrastructure which has resulted in deteriorating roads and unsafe driving conditions for its residents. While this amendment would not create the infrastructure bank itself, it is the initial step toward improving road conditions. A vote in support of the infrastructure bank will ensure funds are available to improve road conditions throughout the state. When casting your vote on November 4, remember this: ✓ The current fuel tax is not keeping up with the growing costs of maintaining Louisiana’s roads. ✓ Louisiana needs a dedicated revenue stream to improve current conditions. ✓ The measure will allow the state to fund transportation project without increasing taxes or fees. ✓ Investing in infrastructure projects creates jobs and stimulates the local economy. ASCE supports the creation and operation of a state infrastructure banks. Such a bank would leverage public funds and private dollars to invest in infrastructure – transportation, water resources, environment, energy, telecommunications, and public facilities projects. The Louisiana Section of ASCE is also supportive of Amendment 4. To help Louisiana take a step in the right direction the Section has pledged their support of the “4 for the Roads” campaign. “4 for the Roads” is a movement to educate Louisiana citizens of the importance of passing Constitutional Amendment 4. Organizations driving the campaign include engineering societies, transportation associations and contractor groups. The time is now to establish a funding source to ease traffic congestion and repair the state’s roads and bridges. Vote “yes” on November 4!

Tags: , ,
1 Comment »

Vote “For” Question 1!: Protect Maryland’s Transportation Trust Fund

October 23rd, 2014 | By: Maria Matthews

car door and key Wisconsin voters aren’t the only ones who will be asked to decide how the state can spend its transportation dollars. On November 4, Maryland voters will also head to the polls to address this very issue. Question 1 will appear on the ballot statewide and if passed, will ensure that revenue allocated to the Transportation Trust Fund will be used exclusively for the construction and maintenance of highways as well as related transportation purposes. The measure offers the strongest possible protection for the Transportation Trust Fund by prohibiting future transfers to the general fund.  Up to now, legislative remedies have not been enough to stem the “raiding” of Maryland’s transportation coffers.  Only a constitutional amendment can ensure that major funds are available for current and future road and transit improvements. A vote “for” provides a reliable source of transportation funding without the creation of new taxes, tolls or user fees as it hinders the diversion of Maryland’s transportation funding for non-transportation purposes. When voting, remember this:
  • A “lock box” will be created ensuring funds will only be able to be used for transportation related purposes.  The only override is a declared fiscal emergency and a three-fifths vote in both houses.
  •  You will prevent further raiding of the state’s transportation dollars. Over $1 billion has already been diverted from local transportation projects and never refunded.
  • The measure will have no effect on current or future tax rates or spending levels.
  • Ensuring funds are available for construction and maintenance of state and local roads will help reduce congestion, improve safety and reliability, create jobs, and boost the state’s economy.
Until July 1995, Maryland had a clear revenue sharing measure in place that designated how the Trust would be funded. In 2014, voters are once again being asked to “lock” the state’s critical transportation fund and prevent transportation dollars from being used for general purposes.

Tags: , ,
1 Comment »

Protect Wisconsin’s Transportation Trust Fund — Vote “Yes” on Question 1!

October 22nd, 2014 | By: Maria Matthews

On November 4, Wisconsin voters will be asked to decide how the state can spend its transportation dollars. Question 1 will appear on the ballot statewide and if passed, will ensure that revenue allocated to the Transportation Trust Fund will not get transferred in to the state’s general fund. A vote “for” will ensure a reliable source of transportation funding without the creation of new taxes, tolls or user fees.  It will also change the state of the Wisconsin Department of Transportation from a statutory agency to one provided for by the state’s constitution. Prevent the diversion of Wisconsin’s transportation funding for non-transportation purposes. When going to the polls on November 4, remember this:
  • A “lock box” will be created ensuring funds will be deposited into the Transportation Fund and only be able to be used for transportation-related purposes.
  • All taxes and fees related to motor vehicles, aircraft, and railroads collected after December 31, 2010 would now be deposited into the Transportation Trust.
  • The measure will elevate the Department of Transportation from a statutory agency to a constitutional agency.
  • The measure does not create additional taxes or user fees.
Up to now, transportation dollars have often been transferred into the general fund to invest in non-transportation projects.   These funds have never been paid back preventing the state from investing in much needed maintenance and improvements. While it is not the answer to all of Wisconsin’s infrastructure revenue needs, vote “yes” to put Wisconsin back on track by “locking up” the Transportation Trust. This midterm election, voters in several states have the opportunity to ensure funding for transportation is designated, including in Maryland.

Tags: , ,
1 Comment »

Vermont Infrastructure Shows Improvement in New Report Card

October 17th, 2014 | By: Infrastructure Report Card

2014 Vermont RC Cover SmallThe latest Report Card for Vermont’s Infrastructure showed a slight improvement in their overall GPA to a “C.” The 2014 Report Card for Vermont’s Infrastructure is an update from 2011, when the state received a “C-” cumulative grade.  The Report Card assessed bridges (C), dams (C), drinking water (C-), wastewater (D), roads (C-), and solid waste (C+). After Tropical Storm Irene damaged the state’s infrastructure backbone in  2011, Vermont made significant investments through catch-up and emergency funding. In addition, the state’s most recent transportation funding package provided close to $700 million for transportation infrastructure, the largest transportation infrastructure investment in state history. There have also been programmatic changes. Road fatalities have been cut nearly in half since 2006 due to changes made using the Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Led by Amanda Hanaway-Corrente, P.E. who chaired the effort and Vermont Section President-Elect Jessica Clark Louisos, P.E., the Report Card was released at a luncheon in Montpelier, which included a keynote from Sue Minter, deputy secretary at the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTRANS) and David Mears, commissioner of the Department of Environmental Conservation. “Vermont is poised to grow our economy as we continue to make investments into our infrastructure. The transportation funding that was signed into law in June is one example of how the state continues to focus on innovation and jobs,” said Minter. Media coverage of the event included the Burlington Free Press and WCAX. Read the full Vermont Report Card IMG_8508_crop Vermont RC Chair ReleaseIMG_8512_lighter  

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
No Comments »

Texans Must Vote “Yes” on Designating Revenue to State Highway Fund

October 6th, 2014 | By: Maria Matthews

Texans have an opportunity to increase their state transportation funding coffers when they go to the voting booth on November 4. Proposition 1 is a statewide ballot measure that will dedicate a portion of the state’s oil and gas tax collections to the State Highway Fund. If the measure passes, $1.7 billion could be transferred to the fund in the first year alone.  This would prove a significant step toward meeting the funding needs of many transportation projects. The measure, a constitutional amendment, reads as follows: “The constitutional amendment providing for the use and dedication of certain money transferred to the state highway fund to assist in the completion of transportation construction, maintenance, and rehabilitation projects, not to include toll roads.” A “yes” vote will ensure a reliable source of transportation funding without the creation of new taxes, tolls or user fees. When you talk with a neighbor about the election, remember this: ✓        Designated funds can only be used for construction, maintenance, rehabilitation, and acquiring right-of-way for public roads. ✓        If approved by voters, 50% of the money currently destined for the state’s Economic Stabilization Fund, or Rainy Day Fund, would be redirected to the State Highway Fund. ✓        The proposition also calls for the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to identify $100 million in savings to reduce long-term debt. ✓        Calls for the creation of a 10 person committee (5 State Senators, 5 State House members) to determine a “sufficient balance” for the Economic Stabilization Fund. Ultimately, voting yes is choosing to invest in mobility for Texas and a stronger economy. The measure is currently supported by the ASCE Texas Section in conjunction with the larger Move Texas Forward Coalition.  Move Texas Forward is committed to improving Texas infrastructure and keeping roads capable of supporting the growth of the state.  The coalition is made up of engineering societies and associations, Chambers of Commerce, transportation councils/coalitions, as well as oil and gas industry organizations. While it will not solve all of Texas’ transportation funding challenges, making funds available to the State Highway Fund is just one step in the right direction for Texas.  For this reason, ASCE encourages Texans to vote “yes” on Proposition 1 in November.

Tags: , , ,
4 Comments »

The Time is Now to Invest in Airports

October 2nd, 2014 | By: America's Infrastructure Report Card

Travel delays at airports have become all too common place. In fact, the surprise usually is that a flight makes it to its destination on time (or if the travel gods are feeling particularly generous, you might make it to your destination a few minutes early). Some of this is beyond anyone’s control: weather patterns and airplane mechanical problems to name a few. But part of this problem is most certainly self-imposed. Inadequate investment in the nation’s aviation system has real consequences, beyond simply making you a few minutes late for check-in at your arriving hotel. In ASCE’s 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure the Society gave a grade of “D” to the aviation sector. Our Failure to Act report highlights the sobering reality that this lack of aviation sector investment has on the broader U.S. economy: a projected $313 billion in loss of GDP by 2020 and 350,000 fewer jobs throughout the economy by 2020. The Society’s dedication to this issue does not stop with economic reports, but rather this data is the gateway to engaging elected officials to act on solutions to these problems. That is why ASCE recently joined with aviation sector stakeholders, such as airports and state legislators, to supports an increase in the passenger facility charge (PFC) cap which would allow airports to raise necessary funds locally for improving the nation’s aviation infrastructure. Funds raised through PFCs are only eligible for use at the airport in which they were collected and can be used on projects to preserve or enhance the safety, security and capacity of the national air transportation system. This funding solution is expected to be under consideration when Congress turns its attention crafting to a broader Federal Aviation Authorization (FAA) reform bill early next year. Until then, you can show support for an improved aviation system by writing your Members of Congress here and using the hashtag #AirportsUnited to help spread the message. It’s time to take human error related to political gridlock out of the equation when it comes to getting travelers to their destinations safely, on-time and hopefully with a little less stress.

Tags: , , ,
1 Comment »

Maximizing the Investment in Transportation Projects

October 1st, 2014 | By: Becky Moylan

ASCE teamed with the Eno Center for Transportation to author Maximizing the Value of Investments Using Life Cycle Cost Analysis. The report, released yesterday at a Capitol Hill briefing, surveyed industry practitioners and policymakers on their current use of life cycle cost analysis (LCCA), and their beliefs on what role it should play in the decision-making process. It also features six case studies that demonstrate the benefits of implementing LCCA. While almost all those surveyed said it should be part of the process, only 59% said it was currently being used.
DSC_7045

Greg Nadeau, Beth Osborne, Joshua Schank (Eno), Pat Natale (ASCE), and Chris Stone all offered their perspectives on the value of LCCA. Photo by Neshan H. Naltchayan

Using LCCA is an “emerging and significant topic,” said Greg Nadeau, acting administrator of the Federal Highway Administration. He was one of the industry experts that shared unique perspectives on the report and how LCCA can benefit transportation project planning during yesterday’s event, which you can watch in-full on YouTube. Nadeau pointed to the need for maximizing investment as the nation faces constrained budgets and aging infrastructure. Beth Osborne from Transportation for America, and ASCE Industry Leaders Council member Christopher Stone, president of Clark Nexsen, shared viewpoints from different perspectives on the current use of LCCA in the industry and the value of increasing its implementation. Osborne believes using LCCA will become easier very quickly, as greater implementation will lead to a discovery that the data needed is already in existence in unexpected places. To help support civil engineers as they incorporate LCCA into decision-making, Stone shared that a course to train leaders in LCCA is critical, as it will reduce the barriers to entry. This report is only a step in incorporating LCCA more broadly. As Nadeau concluded: “This is an iterative process. We will never just rest on our laurels.”

Tags: , , , , ,
1 Comment »

State Legislators Invited to Dream Big!

September 23rd, 2014 | By: Becky Moylan

Last week, ASCE hosted state legislators from nine states at the Washington office as part of a Council of State Governments (CSG) Transportation Policy Academy. ASCE has been a regular sponsor of these forums that bring state legislative leaders together to discuss transportation issues and the challenges they are facing in their respective states. In addition to a presentation on the 2013 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, the event also featured a luncheon presentation on plans for an IMAX movie Dream Big!, which ASCE and the ASCE Foundation are pursuing to put engineering dramatically in the public eye. Lawmakers from Georgia, Hawaii, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Hampshire, North Carolina, South Dakota, Vermont and Washington were in attendance.
CSG-roof

State Legislators visit ASCE’s Washington office during the recent CSG Policy Academy. L-R: Rep. Curtis King (R-Washington), Rep. Patricia Higgins (D-New Hampshire), Rep. Jay Roberts (R-Georgia), Sen. Mike Vehle (R-South Dakota), Rep. Diane Lanpher (D-Vermont), Rep. Ryan Yamane (D-Hawaii), Sen. Ernie Harris (R-Kentucky), Sen. Jim Smith (NP-Nebraska), Rep. William Brawley (R-North Carolina)

CSG regularly brings state legislators who are transportation policy leaders in their states together to tackle key issues. Participants toured transportation megaprojects in Northern Virginia including newly opened stations on the silver line of the Metro. Other participants and speakers in the meeting included the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), U.S. Chamber of Commerce, American Trucking Association, Center for American Progress, Heritage Foundation, Bipartisan Policy Center, Maryland Department of Transportation, Virginia Department of Transportation, and Transportation for America. Over the past couple years, state legislators and Governors have taken the lead on addressing the need for transportation financing with several states passing major initiatives since 2012.

Tags: , , ,
No Comments »

ASCE Members Participate in White House Summit on Infrastructure Investment

September 11th, 2014 | By: America's Infrastructure Report Card

As a part of what the White House has deemed its “Year of Action” campaign to move policy ideas and initiatives forward in the face of Congressional gridlock, the Obama Administration recently held an Infrastructure Investment Summit aimed at soliciting ideas on how to better leverage available financing to deliver projects in the transportation, water, telecommunications and energy sectors.  Participants included cabinet secretaries from the departments of Treasury, Transportation and Commerce as well as leaders from industry, finance, philanthropy and state and local government. Two ASCE members, Anthony Bartolomeo, P.E., F.ASCE who is chairman of the Society’s Industry Leaders Council and Robert Victor, P.E., F.ASCE who chairs ASCE’s Committee on America’s Infrastructure which produced the Society’s national Infrastructure Report Card, participated in the day-long summit with Bartolomeo moderating a small breakout session with Treasury Secretary Jack Lew and Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx in attendance. The goal of the meeting was to identify barriers to accelerating private investment in the US infrastructure network and develop strategies to further deploy the billions of domestic and foreign dollars currently sitting on the sidelines.  The summit will inform an interagency report on the topic which is due for delivery to President Obama on November 14, 2014. Using the summit as a platform for announcement, the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT) declared a $950 million TIFIA loan would be provided for the Orlando, Florida Interstate 4 highway project, which signifies the biggest TIFIA loan to date for a public private partnership (P3). USDOT also announced that it had cleared efforts by Pennsylvania DOT to utilize a $1.2 billion private activity bond allocation to replace more than 500 small bridges within a P3 arrangement. USDOT has recently launched the Build America Transportation Investment Center which released at the summit model P3 contract provisions in order to better assist project sponsors with the guidance and technical assistance necessary to complete highway toll concession arrangements. The topic of P3s is certain to receive further attention in the weeks ahead as the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Transportation & Infrastructure is slated to release a bipartisan report on the topic which will inform their work on accelerating private sector investment in infrastructure.

Tags: , , ,
No Comments »

Help Save America's Infrastructure!
Hide Buttons